Thornbury (2002) How To Teach Vocabulary, Ch5,6 173k5v

5

How to present vocabulary ● Presenting vocabulary ● Using translation ● How to illustrate meaning ● How to explain meaning ● How to highlight the form ● How to involve the learners

Presenting vocabulary

In the last two chapters we looked at possible sources of vocabulary input, including vocabulary books, readers, dictionaries and corpora. A motivated and self-directed learner might be able to acquire a large vocabulary simply by using these resources. However, many learners sign up for language courses in the expectation that, at least some of the time, they will be presented with language, rather than having to go out and find it for themselves. By presentation, we mean those pre-planned lesson stages in which learners are taught pre-selected vocabulary items. Of course, incidental vocabulary teaching can occur at other times of the lesson, as when a text or a discussion throws up unfamiliar vocabulary. In this chapter, however, we will be mainly concerned with ways vocabulary can be formally presented in the classroom. But many of the issues are relevant to the informal teaching of vocabulary as well. As we saw in Chapter 2, at the very least learners need to learn both the meaning and the form of a new word. We shall deal with each of these components in turn. But it’s worth pointing out that both these aspects of a word should be presented in close conjunction in order to ensure a tight meaning-and-form fit. The greater the gap between the presentation of a word’s form and its meaning, the less likely that the learner will make a mental connection between the two. Let’s say the teacher has decided to teach a related set of words — for example, items of clothing: shirt, tros, jacket, socks, dress, jeans. The teacher has a number of options available. First, there is the question of how many words to present. This will depend on the following factors: • the level of the learners (whether beginners, intermediate, or advanced) • the learners’ likely familiarity with the words (learners may have met the words before even though they are not part of their active vocabulary) • the difficulty of the items—whether, for example, they express abstract 75

How to Teach Vocabulary

rather than concrete meanings, or whether they are difficult to pronounce • their ‘teachability’ — whether, for example, they can be easily explained or demonstrated • whether items are being learned for production (in speaking and writing) or for recognition only (as in listening and reading). Since more time will be needed for the former, the number of items is likely to be fewer than if the aim is only recognition. Furthermore, the number of new words presented should not overstretch the learners’ capacity to them. Nor should the presentation extend so far into the lesson that no time is available to put the words to work (see the next chapter). Coursebooks tend to operate on the principle that a vocabulary presentation should include at most about a dozen items. Here, for example, are the items listed in the presentation of clothes vocabulary in a currently popular elementary coursebook (from Soars L and J, Headway Elementary, OUP): a jumper a jacket tros

a shirt a suit jeans

a T-shirt a tie trainers

a dress

a skirt

shoes

boots

However, claims for the desirability of much higher vocabulary learning targets have been made, especially by proponents of teaching methods that subscribe to ‘whole person learning’, such as accelerated learning and suggestopedia (a method first developed by Georgi Lozanov in Bulgaria). Teachers following these methods use techniques of relaxation and suggestion, in order to predispose the learner to massive amounts of input, including literally hundreds of words in a session. Some of these claims may be excessive, but it may also be a fact that conventional teaching methods underestimate the learner’s capacity to retain new vocabulary. Incorporating into lessons some of the basic principles of human memory (as outlined in Chapter 2) may be a means of extending the somewhat conservative targets set in coursebooks. Having decided on the number of items to teach, there is then the choice of the sequence of presentation, either: • meaning first, then form, or • form first, then meaning In the first option the teacher could, for example, hold up a picture of a shirt (the meaning), and then say It’s a shirt (the form). In a ‘form first’ presentation she could say shirt a number of times, have the students repeat the word, and only then point to the picture. Both approaches are valid. There is an argument that presenting the meaning first creates a need for the form, opening the appropriate mental ‘files’, and making the presentation both more efficient and more memorable. On the other hand, ‘form first’ presentation works best when the words are presented in some kind of context, so that the learners can work out the meaning for themselves.

76

5 • How to present vocabulary

The next set of choices relates to the means of presentation - whether to present the meaning through: • • • • • •

translation real things pictures actions/ gestures definitions situations

And whether to present the word in its: • spoken form, or • written form and in what order (e.g. spoken before written) and how soon (e.g. delaying) the written form until the spoken form has been thoroughly learned). There are also decisions to be made concerning the degree of learner involvement. For example: • • • •

should the teacher provide both the meaning and the form herself? should the teacher present the meaning and attempt to elicit the form? should the teacher present the form and attempt to elicit the meaning? should the learners repeat the form, and if so, when?

We will address all these issues in this chapter. Using translation

Traditionally, translation has been the most widely used means of presenting the meaning of a word in monolingual classes. Translation has the advantage of being the most direct route to a word’s meaning — assuming that there is a close match between the target word and its L1 equivalent. It is therefore very economical, and especially suitable for dealing with incidental vocabulary that may crop up in a lesson. However, as we have seen, an over-reliance on translation may mean that learners fail to develop an independent L2 lexicon, with the effect that they always access L2 words by means of their L1 equivalents, rather than directly. Also, because learners don’t have to work very hard to access the meaning, it may mean that the word is less memorable. A case of ‘no pain, no gain’. However, there are a number of different ways of incorporating translation into the vocabulary presentation. Here, for example, are three imaginary extracts in which the Spanish-speaking teacher is teaching her Spanishspeaking students clothing vocabulary: 1

TEACHER:

STUDENTS:

2

TEACHER: STUDENTS:

En inglés pantalones se llaman tros. Tros. Ahora, todos juntos… [In English pantalones are called tros. Tros. Now, all together…] Tros. Does anyone know the English for una camisa? No? Listen, it’s a shirt. Shirt. Repeat. Shirt.

77

How to Teach Vocabulary

3

TEACHER:

STUDENTS: TEACHER: MARTA: TEACHER:

What’s this? [pointing to picture of a dress] Do you know what this is in English? No? Listen, it’s a dress. Dress. Repeat. Dress. How do you say dress in Spanish? Marta? Falda. That’s right.

In the first extract all the teacher’s talk is in Spanish. This effectively deprives learners of valuable L2 input. Moreover, not much attempt is made to involve the learners, apart from simply getting them to repeat the word. In the second extract, the teacher uses only English (the target language), apart from when L1 words are used to introduce meaning. They are thus exposed to a lot more English than simply the target vocabulary items. In the third extract, the presentation is entirely in English. Spanish is used only to check that learners have understood. Opinion is very much divided as to the merits of each approach. Here for example, is an exchange on the subject of translation, between teachers participating on an Internet discussion group (IATEFL Teacher Trainers Special Interest Group Mailing List: [email protected]): [Derrin] On the L1 question. I, a native English speaker, frequently find myself using L1 to quickly clarify my Catalan students’ doubts as to the meaning of unknown lexis in texts they are exposed to. I see little point in walking around a room acting like a chicken for half an hour when you can say ‘pollo’. [Dennis] Well, half an hour would be overdoing it (and are your students THAT slow on the uptake?). But although there are clearly occasions when a short, sharp translation is the most effective method of conveying meaning, is it necessarily the most effective method of encouraging learning? I bet if you did walk around the room acting like a chicken, even for five minutes, saying: ‘I’m a chicken. I’m a chicken.’ your students would never forget the English word for ‘pollo’. And if you acted laying an egg, your fame would spread. [Gulfem] Thanks to Dennis for his … Which reminds me of the whole issue of teaching Young Learners. Surely L1 translation cannot be acceptable in this case. I actually have become a chicken who lays golden eggs (Jack and the Beanstalk) for the students’ benefit and much to their delight: but that’s maybe because I’m female, middle-aged and well rounded: call it type casting if you like! How to illustrate meaning

78

An alternative to translation—and an obvious choice if presenting a set of concrete objects such as clothes items—is to somehow illustrate or demonstrate them. This can be done either by using real objects (called realia) or pictures or mime. The use of realia, pictures and demonstration was a defining technique of the Direct Method. The Direct Method, in rejecting the use of translation, developed as a reaction to such highly intellectual approaches to language learning as Grammar-Translation. Here, for example,

5 • How to present vocabulary

is advice for teachers from a popular Direct Method course of the 1940s: HOW TO TEACH THE NAMES OF OBJECTS The usual procedure is as follows. The teacher first selects a number of objects, in batches of say from 10 to 20. […] The objects may be (a) those that are usually found in the place where the lesson is given, e.g. door, window, knife, match, book; or parts of the body or articles of clothing. (b) those collected specially for the purposes of the lesson, e.g. a stick, a stone, a nail, a piece of wire, a piece of string etc. (c) those represented by pictures, such as those printed on picture cards or wall charts, or by rough drawings on the blackboard. The teacher shows or points to each object in turn and names it. He says the name clearly (but naturally) three or four rimes. […] When the pupils have had sufficient opportunity to hear the words and sentences (and to grasp their meaning) they are called upon to say them. In the first instance they may repeat them after the teacher… (from Palmer H, The Teaching of Oral English, Longman) Such an approach is especially appropriate if teaching beginners, and with mixed nationality classes, where translation is not an option. It is also a technique that has been reclaimed by practitioners of Total Physical Response (TPR), a method that promotes initial immersion in a high quantity of comprehensible input. In making use of the immediate environment of the classroom, and of things that can be brought into the classroom, the intention is to replicate the experience of learning one’s mother tongue. A TPR lesson typically involves the teacher demonstrating actions, using real objects, and then getting the learners to perform the same or similar actions in response to commands. Typical classroom commands might be: Point to the apple. Put the banana next to the apple. Give the apple to Natasha. Offer the banana to Maxim. etc.

(Plastic fruit and vegetables are ideal for this kind of activity.) Visual aids take many forms: flashcards (published and home-made), wall charts, transparencies projected on to the board or wall using the overhead projector, and board drawings. Many teachers collect their own sets of flashcards from magazines, calendars, etc. Especially useful are pictures of items belonging to the following sets: food and drink, clothing, house interiors and furniture, landscapes/exteriors, forms of transport plus a wide selection of pictures of people, sub-divided into sets such as jobs, nationalities, sports,

79

How to Teach Vocabulary

activities and appearance (tall, strong, sad, healthy, old, etc). Not only can such pictures be used to present new vocabulary items, but they can be used to practise them. The use of pictures or objects as prompts for vocabulary teaching can be enhanced if some basic principles of memory are taken into , including the principle of distributed practice (see page 24). In teaching a set of, say, ten clothing items, it is important to keep reviewing the previously introduced items, preferably in a varying order—something like this: present shirt present jacket present tros review shirt review tros present dress review jacket present sweater review dress review shirt present socks etc. Another principle underlying effective memorisation is, as much as is possible, to allow learners to work at their own pace. In this way they can form associations and think of mnemonic devices that are personally relevant, and appropriate to the degree of difficulty the word is causing them. This is more likely to happen if they are working on their own or in small groups. But by building pauses into a teacher-led presentation, the teacher can provide learners with rime to ‘catch up’ and to reflect. Here, by way of example, are some activities using flashcards: ■ The teacher shows cards one at a time, and either elicits or says the word it represents. As a rule of thumb, about ten unfamiliar words is probably sufficient. Periodically the teacher backtracks and changes the order (see above). Finally, stick all the cards on to the board, and write the words alongside (or ask learners to come up and write them). ■ Stick a collection of picture cards (e.g. clothes) on the board and number them. (If you are working round a large table, place the cards face up on the table.) Invite learners to ask you about the words they are unfamiliar with. For example: What’s number 6? Check to see if someone else knows before giving the answer. When students are sufficiently familiar go through them all, asking, What’s number 8? etc. As a check, turn the cards around, one at a time, so that they can’t be seen, and again ask What’s number 8? Finally, write the words on the board alongside each picture.

80

5 • How to present vocabulary

■ Stick a selection of cards on the board and allow learners to use bilingual dictionaries to find the words they represent. They can then write the words adjacent to the pictures. ■ Give pairs or groups of three a selection of cards each. They can use bilingual dictionaries to find out the word for each picture. Then, representatives from each group can ‘teach’ the rest of the class the words they have discovered, using the visual aids. ■ Show the class a wall chart or a large picture containing many different items (e.g. a street scene or an airport) for a short period of time, say ten seconds. Individually or in pairs, the learners then have to write down as many words—in English—as they can having seen represented in the picture. Allow them to use dictionaries. Show the picture again for another few seconds, to let them extend their lists of words. Reveal the picture for the checking stage: the individual or pair with the most correct words is the winner. How to explain meaning

Of course, reliance on real objects, illustration, or demonstration, is limited. It is one thing to mime a chicken, but quite another to physically represent the meaning of a word like intuition or become or trustworthy. Also, words frequently come up incidentally, words for which the teacher won’t have visual aids or realia at hand. An alternative way of conveying the meaning of a new word is simply to use words—other words. This is the principle behind dictionary definitions. Non-visual, verbal means of clarifying meaning include: • • • •

providing an example situation giving several example sentences giving synonyms, antonyms, or superordinate giving a full definition

All of the above procedures can be used in conjunction, and also in combination with visual means such as board drawings or mime. Although a verbal explanation may take a little longer than using translation, or visuals or mime, the advantages are that the learners are getting extra ‘free’ listening practice, and, by being made to work a little harder to get to the meaning of a word, they may be more cognitively engaged. Obviously, it is important, when using words in order to define other words, that the defining words themselves are within the learners’ current range. Doctor Johnson’s definition of a net in his famous dictionary is an example of what not to say in the classroom: Anything reticulated or decussated at equal distances with interstices between the intersections! A situational presentation involves providing a scenario which clearly contextualises the target word (or words). Here, for example, is a situation for teaching embarrassed/embarrassing:

81

How to Teach Vocabulary

Catherine saw a man at the bus stop. His back was turned but she was sure it was her brother, so she tapped him on the shoulder with her umbrella and shouted ‘Look out! The police are after you!’ The man turned around. He was a complete stranger. SHE WAS TERRIBLY EMBARRASSED. IT WAS A VERY EMBARRASSING EXPERIENCE. (from O’Neill R, English in Situations, OUP) Reinforcing a situational presentation with pictures, board drawings, or gestures makes it more intelligible, and perhaps more memorable. More memorable still is the situation that comes directly from the experience of the people in the room—whether the teacher or students. In other words, the teacher could tell her own story of when she was embarrassed, and then invite the students to tell their own. Again, the extra ‘free’ speaking and listening practice justifies the relatively long time spent on just one or two items of vocabulary. An alternative to the situational approach is to provide students with example sentences, each one being a typical instance of the target word in context. This is not dissimilar to the way concordances can be used (see page 70). From the cumulative effect of the sentences the students should be able to hypothesise the meaning of the target word—using induction: the mental process of hypothesising from examples. Here is a teacher giving sentence examples for the word fancy: T:

Listen to these sentences and see if you can work out what the verb fancy means: Number one: He’s really nice, but I don’t fancy him. [pause] Two: I fancy eating out tonight. Don’t you? [pause] Three: Do you fancy a cup of coffee? [pause] Four: Fancy a drink? [pause] Five: That guy on the dance floor—he really fancies himself. [pause] And six: I never really fancied package holidays much. [pause] OK, talk to your neighbour and then I’ll read them again…

Allow the students as many hearings of the sentences as they think they need before they are confident enough to venture an answer. (For particularly difficult words, it may help if the learners write the sentences down.) Depending on whether the class is monolingual or not, the teacher can then elicit a mother tongue translation of the target word, or, alternatively, a synonym or definition. One advantage of this approach is that the learners hear the word several times, increasing the likelihood of retention in memory. Another advantage is that they hear the word in a variety of typical contexts (rather than just one) so they can start to get a feel for its range of uses as well as its typical collocations (e.g. fancy a drink). Finally, they get information on the word’s form and grammar—whether, for example, it is irregular or transitive (if a verb), or countable (if a noun). It may seem to involve quite a lot of preparation for the teacher, but consulting dictionaries and corpora for examples of the target words in context can help reduce planning time.

82

5 • How to present vocabulary

Very often a quick explanation, using a synonym (‘fancy’—it means ‘like’), antonym (‘outgoing’—it’s the opposite of ‘shy, introverted’) or a superordinate term (a ‘herring’ is a kind of fish), will serve, especially in incidental vocabulary work. This is particularly useful when glossing (explaining) words that come up in texts. More elaborate definitions, such as those in dictionaries, require more effort on the part of both teacher and learner. Lexicographers (dictionary writers) spend a great deal of time agonising over definitions, so there is no reason to think that teachers will find them any easier. Fortunately, learners’ dictionaries phrase their definitions in language that offers teachers a reliable model, should they need one. Here, for example, is the definition for petrify from two dictionaries—first, a conventional dictionary and, second, a learners’ dictionary:

(from the Concise Oxford Dictionary)

(from the Collins COBUILD English Dictionary) A variant of the definition approach is to present a layered definition—that is, one that is segmented into several short statements, each one including the target word. This is similar to the example sentences approach mentioned above, but in this case the sentences are discrete components of a larger definition. For example: T:

If you feel petrified you are very, very frightened. Someone can be petrified by fear. Petrified literally means turned to stone. Petrified wood is wood that has become stone. In some places you can see petrified forests.

In this way, the meaning—and shades of meaning—of a word are built up piece by piece, with the added advantage that the learners hear the target word not only in context, but repeated (in the above example five times).

83

How to Teach Vocabulary

In reality, most teachers draw on a range of techniques—situations, synonyms, example sentences, etc.—in their presentations of word meaning. Here, for example, is an extract from a lesson in which the teacher uses a variety of means—including words that the students are already familiar with—to introduce petrified: T:

S: T:

S: T: S: T:

OK is anyone very frightened of ghosts? Would you be frightened if you saw a ghost? Frightened. OK, I know if I saw, for example, if I saw a ghost, there is one feeling I would feel. I would feel frightened. [writes] But even more than frightened, how would you feel if you saw a ghost? More than frightened, stronger, than frightened. Terrified. Good, terrified. [writes] Terrified. Anything even stronger than terrified? A word in English. Even, really, you’re so frightened you’re… Scared. That’s not, that’s the same as frightened. There’s something that’s stronger. Astonished. Astonished. Astonished is a little bit more like surprised. I think— terrified; there’s an even stronger word, which would be petrified. [writes] And it means when you are so frightened that you can’t speak, you can’t think, and you can’t move. You’re absolutely petrified. And I think if I saw a ghost I would probably be [laughs] probably be petrified, being the rather pathetic soul that I am.

Finally, it’s worth emphasising that learning the meaning of a word—or learning anything, for that matter—is a process of gradual approximation. Even in our first language, it may take a long period of ‘fuzziness’ before we feel comfortable ing certain words. It is probably asking too much of teachers to expect them to clarify every nuance of a word’s meaning at first encounter. Better that they orientate their learners in the general direction of a word’s meaning, while equipping them with the skills and the motivation to continue exploring the further reaches of that word’s ‘semantic space’. How to highlight the form

84

In Chapter 2 we noted the fact that the sound of words, as much as their meaning, determines the way they are stored in the mental lexicon. The fact that like-sounding words are often confused (tambourines for trampolines, or chicken for kitchen, for example) is evidence of this. This suggests that highlighting the spoken form of a word is very important in of ensuring it is appropriately stored. This in turn means drawing learners’ attention to the way the word sounds. Words seem to be stored and accessed primarily according to their overall syllable structure and stress. Hence it is easy to confuse tambourine and trampoline because they have the same general shape, despite some differences of individual sounds. This suggests that highlighting the stress and general shape of the word is a useful aid to retention and deserves as much attention as the individual sounds.

5 • How to present vocabulary

There are a number of ways of highlighting the spoken form of the word. Essentially these are: • listening drills • oral drills • boardwork Having established the meaning of a new word, the teacher can model it using listening drills. A drill is any repetition of a short chunk of language. In this case, it is the teacher who does the repeating, so as to accustom the learners to the phonological features of the word. Customarily, this takes the form of a clear but natural enunciation of the word (or words), usually preceded by some sort of cue, such as ‘Listen…’. This is repeated two or three times. To draw learners’ attention to the syllable structure and stress of the word, this modelling process can be accompanied by some kind of visual stimulus, such as using the fingers of one hand to represent the different syllables. The teacher can also ask the class to identify the stressed syllable. The question Where’s the stress? is a good one for learners to get used to. One way of introducing the idea of stress—in the first lesson, for example—is to ask the learners to say how many syllables there are in their own names, and which of these syllables is stressed. (Of course, if it’s a one-syllable name, the stress will be on that one syllable.) In drill-and-repeat type methodologies, such as audiolingualism, it would then be customary for learners to repeat the new word, both in chorus and individually, in order to reinforce it in memory. More recently, the value of simply repeating newly introduced language—especially grammatical structures—has been questioned. Some writers argue that the requirement to ‘get one’s tongue round it’ may distract from the cognitive work involved in ‘getting one’s mind round it’. As we saw in Chapter 2 (see page 23), we forget words quickly if there is any interference or interruption of the articulatory loop (the process of subvocal repetition on which working memory depends). This suggests that allowing learners two or three seconds ‘processing’ time between hearing a new word and saying it might have benefits in of retention in memory. One way of encouraging subvocalisation is sometimes known as a mumble drill. At a cue from the teacher, learners mumble or mutter the word to themselves at their own pace. Evidence suggests that subvocalisation is a technique that successful learners use naturally (see page 161), so it may be one worth establishing as standard classroom practice. However, to withhold production indefinitely is likely to frustrate learners, whose instinct is often to have a go at repeating a new word themselves. And nothing gives learners a better feel for the shape of a word than saying it— even if the teacher’s intention is to teach the word for recognition only. It may be appropriate, therefore, to get learners to vocalise the new words, after they have first subvocalised them, by means of choral or individual repetition, i.e. drilling.

85

How to Teach Vocabulary

Features of the word’s pronunciation can also be highlighted using the board. Many teachers use some kind of symbol—such as a small box—to indicate where the primary stress is placed.

Providing learners with a transcription of the word using phonemic script is another way of highlighting the pronunciation visually. The phonemic transcription of frightened is /fraɪtənd/. Use of phonemic symbols also avoids the potentially negative effects of sound-spelling mismatches (but see below). Of course, this assumes learners are familiar with phonemic script. lf they are not, they may find the extra learning load daunting, especially if they are still getting used to Roman script (as may be the case for learners whose mother tongue uses a different script). On the other hand, there is no great mystery to phonemic script, especially reading it (as opposed to writing it). Most of the consonant sounds are easily decipherable so it is mainly a task of getting to know how the many English vowel sounds are represented—a task that can be spread over a number of lessons, if necessary. Also, the fact that all good learner dictionaries use a standardised form of phonemic script means that further reinforcement can be provided by dictionary activities that focus on pronunciation (see page 66). (For a detailed reference chart of English sounds and the way they are produced, see Appendix A in Gerald Kelly’s How to Teach Pronunciation, in this series.) How soon should learners meet the written form of a new word? Traditionally, it was felt that meeting the written form too soon would interfere with correct pronunciation habits. This is specially the case in English (it was argued), where sound-spelling matches are notoriously unreliable. Learners who are pronouncing words like cupboard, suit, and island perfectly correctly, having only heard them, often regress to ‘cupboard’, ‘sweet’ and ‘is-land’, once exposed to the written form. On these grounds, presentation of the written form used to be delayed until learners were thoroughly familiar with the spoken form. However, the counter argument runs that—since learners are going to meet the written form eventually—it may be better to deal with any sound-spelling mismatches head on, and get these difficulties out of the way sooner rather than later. After all, learners are likely to form a mental representation of the probable spelling of new words as soon as they first hear them, so it is better that this mental representation is an accurate one. Moreover, the soundspelling irregularities in English are often overstated. It is true that there are some extremely unreliable spellings (the -ough family being the most commonly cited). But the vast majority of words in English conform to a fairly small set of rules. Avoiding the issue by withholding the written form may deprive learners of the opportunity of observing these regularities for themselves. A useful strategy, therefore, might be to ask learners, soon after hearing a new word, to attempt to spell it. (Or, if the first meeting is with the

86

5 • How to present vocabulary

written form, to attempt to pronounce it.) If they are having trouble doing this, the teacher can prompt them by reminding them of familiar words with a similar pronunciation or spelling. In Chapter 9 we will look at some useful spelling rules that can be taught to learners. But there is an even more important reason for being introduced to the written form as soon as possible. Crucial clues to meaning are often much easier to identify in the written form than in the spoken form of the word. In speaking, sounds tend to merge, or are even dropped entirely, such that even in carefully articulated speech a word like handbag sounds like hambag, and police station comes out as plee station. In the absence of key morphological information (like hand- and police) learners have nothing to attach the new word to—or nowhere to ‘file’ it—and therefore find it difficult to understand and . So the effort involved in learning it is that much greater. Many experienced teachers will be familiar with the surprised look of recognition on students’ faces once they see the written form of a word they have been labouring to make sense of. Depriving them of this form may be counterproductive. How to involve the learners

The word ‘presentation’ has connotations of teacher as transmitter, and learners as ive recipients, of language facts. But, as was pointed out in Chapter 2 (page 30), ‘learners need to be actively involved in the learning of words’. How can learners be given more involvement in the presentation phase of word learning? One technique that has already been mentioned in this chapter is elicitation. A standard elicitation procedure is for the teacher to present the meaning of a word (e.g. by showing a picture) and asking learners to supply the form: T: (showing picture of waterfall) What’s this? Tomas? S: Cataract? T: Not exactly. Elena? S: Waterfall? T: Good. Alternatively, the teacher can supply the word, and elicit a definition, synonym or example: T: What’s a waterfall? Anyone? S: Like Niagara? T: Yes, exactly. This second procedure, going from form to meaning, is typical of text-based vocabulary work. It also occurs when words come up naturally in classroom talk (see, for example, the extract of classroom talk on page 50). The rationale underlying elicitation is that: • it actively involves the learners in the lesson • it maximises speaking opportunities • it keeps the learners alert and attentive

87

How to Teach Vocabulary

• it challenges better learners who might otherwise ‘turn off’ • it acts as a way of checking the learners’ developing understanding • in the case of form-first presentations it encourages learners to use contextual clues If overused, however, many of the advantages of elicitation may be lost. First of all, only the better learners may be involved in the process, while the others remain ive bystanders. The use of names (or nominating) when eliciting is one way round this: What’s a ‘waterfall? Etsuko? or Sylvia, how do you say ‘kolega’ in English? Prolonged elicitation sequences can end up being very frustrating for learners if they simply don’t know the answers the teacher is seeking—a cross between a quiz show and a police interrogation. Finally, if all or most of the teacher’s questions are elicitation questions, the quality of teacher-student talk can become compromised. After all, in the outside world, we seldom spend a lot of conversational time asking questions for which we already know the answer (like What’s a waterfall?) There are times when learners need exposure to ‘real’ questions, such as What’s the biggest waterfall you’ve ever seen? This suggests that another important way of involving learners is to have them personalise the new words. Personalisation is simply the process of using the new word in a context that is real for the learner personally. The point was made, in Chapter 2 (page 30), that ‘memory of new words can be reinforced if they are used to express personally relevant meanings’. There are many ways of doing this. Here are some ideas: ■ Ask learners to write a true sentence using the new word, preferably applying it to themselves or someone they know—more easily done with words like frightened and embarrassed than perhaps words like waterfall. To help, provide a sentence frame, such as The last time I felt frightened was when… Or The biggest waterfall I have ever seen… ■ Learners write questions for other learners, incorporating the new word. For example: What makes you embarrassed/frightened? They exchange questions, write the answers, and then report to the rest of the class. ■ Ask learners to make an association network centred on the new word. That is, they connect the word to other words that they associate with it, however far-fetched, drawing a diagram in the manner of the example opposite. They then compare their networks with those of other students, asking about, and explaining, the associations. Here, for example, is the association network produced by one student for the word iron:

88

5 • How to present vocabulary

■ If teaching a lexical set such as food items, or forms of transport, or jobs, or kinds of film, ask the learners to rank the items in order of personal preference—from most preferred to least preferred. For example, drama, thriller, musical, western, costume drama, horror movie… Then, in pairs, they compare and explain their rankings. Finally, an alternative to teacher presentation—and one that maximally involves learners—is peer teaching, i.e. learners teaching each other vocabulary. One way of doing this is through an information gap activity: This is an activity in which information is distributed between students in pairs or small groups. In order to complete a task, students must exchange information in order to ‘fill the information gap’. If the information also includes words whose meaning is known only to individual of the group, the information exchange will require to teach each other those words.

89

How to Teach Vocabulary

■ For example, imagine each member of a pair has one of the following pictures:

90

5 • How to present vocabulary

The aim is to exchange information about the pictures in order to find the ten differences. At some stage this will involve students using the words that have been glossed at the bottom of their picture—for example jug in Picture A. Because their partner does not have the word for jug, (and in all likelihood will not know it) he or she will have to ask for an explanation. A probable sequence might go like this: STUDENT 1: STUDENT 2: STUDENT 1: STUDENT 2: STUDENT 1: STUDENT 2: STUDENT 1: STUDENT 2:

Is there a jug on the table in your picture? A what? A jug. What is ‘jug’? A jug is a thing for keep water or milk. Ah. Yes. I have one—what is called—judge? Jug. J-U-G. Yes, there is one jug on the table in my picture.

etc. The extra effort put into negotiating the meaning and form of the unfamiliar words pays off in of learning. Note, for a start, how many times the word jug was used. Research suggests that negotiation of word meaning in this way is a very powerful learning tool, and is more memorable, on the whole, than teacher presentation. In order to maximise its usefulness, it may help if learners have been taught some simple defining expressions, such as It’s a thing you use for… It’s made of… It looks like… Other ways of setting up peer teaching tasks include: ■ Give each student in a group a card (or cards) with a different word on it, the meaning of the word being provided in the form, for example, of a translation, synonym or picture. Students have to study their card(s) silently and learn their words. Then the group is given a task which involves using the words. For example, it might be a story construction activity, in which students have to order sentences, each of which contains one of the targeted words. To do the task, each student would have to explain to the other of the group the words that they have just studied. ■ Alternatively, they are asked to categorise the words on the cards into groups, or to rank them according to some criteria. They might, for example, be objects which are ranked according to their usefulness on a desert island. In order to do this task, students will first need to teach each other the words they have learned individually. ■ Each student is given a list of six to eight words, with their translations or definitions. For example, one student may get the following: check in, boarding , duty free, luggage, security check, departure gate, etc. Another may get: camp fire, frying pan, pocket knife, matches, backpack, etc. They have to work these words into a short narrative. They then tell each other their narrative, explaining any unfamiliar words as they go along.

91

How to Teach Vocabulary Conclusions

In this chapter we looked at techniques and procedures which involve direct teacher intervention in the teaching of pre-selected items of vocabulary. Among the choices available to the teacher when planning a vocabulary presentation are the following: • • • • • • • • •

how many words to present at a time whether to present the meaning of words first or the form first whether to use translation as the means of presenting meaning, or whether to use some form of illustration, such as realia, visual aids, or mime, or whether to use a verbal means of presentation, such as an example situation, example sentences, synonyms, or definitions how to present the spoken form and whether this should involve student repetition how soon to present the written form how, and to what extent, to involve the learners in the presentation, through the use of elicitation, personalisation, and peer teaching, for example

Some of the conclusions reached include the following: • the number of words that can be learned is constrained by factors such as word difficulty, but need not be limited to only a few words • establishing the meaning of a new word first and then presenting its form is a standard approach • translation is an economical way of presenting meaning but may not be the most memorable • illustrating meaning is effective, but is limited to certain kinds of words • explaining meaning verbally is time-consuming but can be effective if explanations are kept clear and simple • the spoken form can be highlighted through the giving of clear models, the use of phonemic script, and repetition • the written form should not be withheld too long • learners should be actively involved in the presentation Looking ahead

92

Presenting words is only the tip of the iceberg. To ensure that learners get to ‘know’ these words to the extent outlined in Chapter 2, they will need plentiful opportunities to engage with these words in a variety of contexts, and to ‘put these words to work’—the theme of the chapter that follows.

6

How to put words to work ● Integrating new knowledge into old ● Decision-making tasks ● Production tasks ● Games

Integrating new knowledge into old

Decisionmaking tasks

Traditionally, the presentation of new language items would swiftly be followed by the practice of these items. This practice would typically take the form of some of kind of oral repetition, such as a drill. This notion of mechanical practice underlies the popular belief that ‘practice makes perfect’. However, as we saw in Chapter 2, simply repeating newly learned words is no guarantee that they will move from the short-term memory store into permanent memory. New knowledge—i.e. new words—needs to be integrated into existing knowledge—i.e. the learners’ existing network of word associations, or what we called the mental lexicon. As we also saw in the discussion on memory, there is a greater likelihood of the word being integrated into this network if many ‘deep’ decisions have been made about it. In other words, to ensure long-term retention and recall, words need to be ‘put to work’. They need to be placed in working memory, and subjected to different operations. Such operations might include: being taken apart and put back together again, being compared, combined, matched, sorted, visualised and re-shuffled, as well as being repeatedly filed away and recalled (since the more often a word is recalled, the easier recall becomes). In this chapter we will look at a range of activity types designed to do just that. They might best be thought of as integration activities, rather than ‘practice activities’ or ‘reinforcement activities’, since both these latter have associations with a more mechanical, less cognitive, approach to language teaching. There are many different kinds of tasks that teachers can set learners in order to help move words into long-term memory. Some of these tasks will require more brain work than others. That is to say, they will be more cognitively demanding. Tasks in which learners make decisions about words can be divided into the following types, roughly arranged in an order from least cognitively demanding to most demanding: • identifying • selecting • matching

93

How to Teach Vocabulary

• sorting • ranking and sequencing The more of these task types that can be performed on a set of words the better. In other words, an identification task could be followed by a matching task, which in turn could be followed by a ranking task. Identifying words simply means finding them where they may otherwise be ‘hidden’, such as in texts. ■ Here, for example, are some identification tasks relating to the text Fear of flying (on page 42). Give the learners the text and ask them to: • • • • •

Count the number of times plane(s) and train(s) occur in the text. Find four words connected with flying in the text. Find five phrasal verbs in the text. Find eight comparative adjectives in the text. Underline all the words ending in -ing in the text.

Ask them to read the text, then turn it over, and then ask: • ‘Did the following words occur in the text?’ busy

crowded

dirty

convenient

fast

dangerous

inconvenient

uncomfortable noisy

• ‘Now check the text to see if you were right.’ Listening out for particular words in a spoken or recorded text is also a form of identification activity. Below is a selection of identification tasks based on this text: ■

OK, that’s Mr Brown. He’s wearing a jacket and tros, no tie, and he’s talking to the woman with the long dark hair—she’s wearing a black dress. Now Mrs Brown is over there. She’s wearing a skirt and a blouse, and she’s talking to a tall man with fair hair. And their son, Richard… yes, there he is, he’s over in the corner. He’s wearing jeans and a T-shirt—he’s the one with very short hair.

(from Doff A and Jones C, Language in Use (Beginner Workbook), CUP) • List all the clothes items that you hear. • Raise your hand when you hear a clothes item. • Put these items in the order that you hear them: blouse

tie

skirt

jeans

jacket

T-shirt

dress

tros

jacket

hat

• Tick the items that you hear: blouse shoes tie shorts skirt socks jeans T-shirt dress tros suit shirt

• Listen for clothes words and write them in the correct column: Mr Brown

94

Mrs Brown

Richard

6 • How to put words to work

Identification is also the process learners apply in tasks in which they have to unscramble anagrams (such as utis, snaje, eti—for suit, jeans, tie), or when they have to search for words in a ‘word soup’, such as the following (also from Language in Use):

Selecting tasks are cognitively more complex than identification tasks, since they involve both recognising words and making choices amongst them. This may take the form of choosing the ‘odd one out’, as in this task (again, based on the lexical set of clothes):

95

How to Teach Vocabulary

■ Choose the odd one out in each group: 1 2 3

tros blouse T-shirt

socks skirt suit

jeans tie shorts

T-shirt dress trainers

etc. Note that with this kind of activity, there is no ‘right’ answer necessarily. What is important is that learners are able to justify their choice, whatever their answer. It is the cognitive work that counts—not getting the right answer. Here is another open-ended selection task, with a personalised element:

Another useful selecting task that can be applied to any vocabulary lesson is: ■ Choose five (or ten or twenty) words from this lesson to learn. Think of how you will demonstrate—in the next class—that you have learned them. The same kind of task can be applied to any text that the learners have read or listened to. And, as a way of recycling vocabulary items from previous lessons, learners can select words from their notebooks to ‘test’ their classmates at the beginning of each lesson.

96

6 • How to put words to work

A matching task involves first recognising words and then pairing them with—for example—a visual representation, a translation, a synonym, an antonym, a definition, or a collocate. As an example of this last type, here is a verb-noun matching task:

Pelmanism is a memory game which involves nothing but matching. Word pairs (or picture-word matches) are printed on individual cards which are placed face down in a random distribution. Players take turns to pick up a card and then search for its partner. If they correctly locate the partner (initially by guesswork, but, as the game progresses, by ing where individual cards are located), they keep the pair, and have another turn. If not, they lay

97

How to Teach Vocabulary

the cards face down where they found them, and the next player has a turn. The player with the most pairs at the end of the game is the winner. Typical pairs might be: • antonyms (tall—short, thick—thin, dark—light, etc.) • British and American equivalents (bill—check, pharmacy—drugstore, lift—elevator, etc.), or • collocations (wide + awake, stark + naked, fast + asleep, etc.) Sorting activities require learners to sort words into different categories. The categories can either be given, or guessed. Here is an example of the former (from Thornbury S, Highlight Pre-Intermediate, Heinemann):

■ Here is an activity in which learners (at a fairly advanced level) decide the categories themselves: Put these words into four groups of three words each. Then, think of a title for each group. goal court

net piece club racket shoot board hole pitch referee check serve tee

green move

Now, can you add extra words to each group? Finally, ranking and sequencing activities require learners to put the words into some kind of order. This may involve arranging the words on a cline: for example, adverbs of frequency (always, sometimes, never, occasionally, often, etc). Or learners may be asked to rank items according to preference: ■ Imagine you have just moved into a completely empty flat. You can afford to buy one piece of furniture a week. Put the following items in the order in which you would buy them: fridge bed desk dining table sofa wardrobe chair dishwasher bookcase washing machine chest of drawers

cooker

Now, compare your list with another student and explain your order. If you were sharing the flat together, would you agree? If not, make a new list that you both agree about. Here is an example of a ranking activity (from Morgan J and Rinvolucri M, Vocabulary, OUP) that can be adapted to different levels by changing the selected words:

98

6 • How to put words to work

Ordering items chronologically is another way of getting students to make judgements about words. For example: ■ Put the following words in the order in which they typically happen in your country: graduate get married be born get divorced get engaged die retire leave home have children re-marry start school

Any sequence of activities—from starting a car to buying a home—lends itself to the same treatment. Here, for example, is a task that focuses on the language of air travel (from Garton-Sprenger J and Greenall S, Flying Colours 2, Heinemann):

99

How to Teach Vocabulary

Note that there may not be a ‘right answer’ in a ranking or sequencing task, but that the exercise of making the choices and—even better—comparing them with a classmate’s choices, is good ‘brain work’. Production tasks

The decision-making tasks we have been looking at are principally receptive: learners make judgements about words, but don’t necessarily produce them. (Of course, they can then become production tasks by the simple expedient of inviting the learners to talk about these judgements.) However, tasks that are productive from the outset are those in which the learners are required to incorporate the newly studied words into some kind of speaking or writing activity. These can be classified as being of two main types: • completion—of sentences and texts • creation—of sentences and texts Sentence and text completion tasks are what are more generally known as gap-fills. They are usually writing tasks and they are often used in tests (see Chapter 8) as they are easy to design and mark. They have many different formats, but a basic distinction can be made between open and closed gapfills. The open type is one where the learner fills the gaps by drawing on their mental lexicon. (There may be a clue, though, such as the first letter of the word.) In a closed gap-fill, on the other hand, the words are provided, in the form of a list at the beginning of the exercise, for example. It is simply a matter of deciding which word goes in which gap. Here are some example instructions for open and closed gap-fill tasks: • Complete the text by writing an appropriate word in each space: ’Greta Garbo, the Swedish-born film _____, was born in 1905. She won a scholarship to drama school, where she learned to _____. In 1924 a film director chose her for a in a Swedish film called…’ • Choose the best word from the list to complete each sentence. Use each word once… • Select words from the list to complete these sentences. Note that there are more words than sentences… • Choose words from the text you have just read to complete these sentences… • Choose the best word to complete each sentence: 1 a b c d etc.

When I feel tired, I can’t stop _____. sneezing yawning coughing weeping

Note that the last example is a multiple choice task. These are very popular with designers of vocabulary tests (see Chapter 8).

100

6 • How to put words to work

In completion tasks, the context is provided, and it is simply a matter of slotting the right word in. Sentence and text creation tasks, however, require learners to create the contexts for given words. Here are some typical task instructions: • Use each of these words to make a sentence which clearly shows the meaning of the word. • Choose six words from the list and write a sentence using each one. • Use each of these words to write a true sentence about yourself or someone you know. • Write a short narrative (or dialogue) which includes at least five words from the list. Tasks such as these lead naturally into speaking activities—either reading aloud or performing dialogues to the class, or comparing and explaining sentences in pairs or small groups. These activities involve many of the processes that serve to promote retention in long-term memory, such as rehearsal, repetition and explanation. Not all creation activities need start as writing tasks. Here is a speaking task (also from Flying Colours 2) which requires learners to create sentences using pre-selected vocabulary:

The use of questionnaires is a good way of putting vocabulary to work in the form of question-and-answer exchanges. Many areas of vocabulary lend themselves to some kind of questionnaire or survey. The same vocabulary items in the preceding example could be used as the basis of a questionnaire or survey. ■ Students can prepare a survey—using these examples as a model: 1 Is your hometown boring or interesting? Why? 2 Do you find big cities: depressing, interesting, lively or noisy? Why? etc. They then ask each other their prepared questions, and report the results to the class, using full sentences, such as Mario thinks his hometown is interesting because it has a lot of historical monuments.

101

How to Teach Vocabulary Games

While the title of this chapter is ‘How to put words to work’, it would be wrong to suggest that vocabulary learning has to be all work and no play. Language play, including word games, has a long history. Children of all cultures seem to enjoy games of the ‘I spy…’ or ‘Hangman’ type, and there is a long tradition of adult word games, a number of which have been adapted for television. Most first-language word games transfer comfortably to the second-language classroom. The most useful will be those that are consistent with the principles of learning outlined on pages 24 and 25. For example, the more often a word is successfully retrieved from memory, the easier it becomes to recall it. Therefore, useful games are those that encourage learners to recall words and, preferably, at speed. Or, consistent with the principle that learners need to make multiple decisions about words, a useful game would be one like a ‘dictionary race’, where students first sort words into alphabetical order, then into parts of speech, and then into lexical sets—the first group to complete all three tasks correctly being the winner. However, since many word games deal solely with isolated—rather than contextualised—words, and often require only shallow processing on the part of the learner, they should be used judiciously. The time spent on a single decontextualised word in a game of ‘Hangman’, for example, has to be weighed up against the more productive, contextualised and cognitively deep activities outlined earlier in this chapter. Too often games are used to plug holes in lessons which could more usefully be filled with language-rich talk. Nevertheless, the fun factor may help make words more memorable, and, like it or not, a competitive element often serves to animate even the most lethargic students. So, here are some word games to try: ■ Word clap: Students stand or sit in a circle, and, following the teacher’s lead, maintain a four-beat rhythm, clapping their hands on their thighs three times (one-two-three…) and then both hands together (four!). The game should start slowly, but the pace of the clapping can gradually increase. The idea is to take turns, clockwise, to shout out a different word from a pre-selected lexical set (for example, fruit and vegetables) on every fourth beat. Players who either repeat a word already used, or break the rhythm—or say nothing—are ‘out’ and the game resumes without them, until only one player is left. The teacher can change the lexical set by shouting out the name of a new set at strategic points: Furniture! Nationalities! jobs! etc. ■ Categories: Learners work in pairs or small groups. On a piece of paper, they draw up a number of columns, according to a model on the board, each column labelled with the name of a lexical set: e.g. fruit, transport, clothes, animals, sports. The teacher calls out a letter of the alphabet (e.g. B!), and to a time limit (e.g. three minutes), students write down as many words as they can beginning with that letter in the separate columns (banana, berry; bus; bikini, blouse; bear, bat; baseball, basketball…). The group with the most (correct) words wins.

102

6 • How to put words to work

■ Noughts and crosses: Draw two noughts and crosses grids on the board:

One is blank. In the other each square is labelled with a category, or with nine different phrasal verb particles (up, on, off; in, back, etc), or nine different affixes (un-, non-, -less, -tion, etc). Prepare a number of questions relating to each category. For example (if the class is monolingual): How do you say ‘tamburo’· in English? Or, What is the opposite of ‘shy’? Divide the class into two teams: noughts and crosses. The object is to take turns choosing a category and answering a question in this category correctly so as to earn the right to place their team’s symbol in the corresponding position in the blank grid. The winning team is the first to create a line of three (noughts or crosses), either vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. ■ Coffeepot: This is a guessing game. One learner answers yes/no questions from the rest of the class (or group) about a verb that she has thought of, or that the teacher has whispered to her. In the questions the word coffeepot is used in place of the mystery verb. So, for example, students might ask Do you coffeepot indoors or outdoors? Is coffeepotting easy or difficult? Can you coffeepot with your hands? etc. If the verb that the student has selected is yawn the answers would be: Both indoors and outdoors; It’s easy; No, you can’t, but you might use your hands… To make the game easier a list of, say, twenty verbs can be put on the board and the person who is ‘it’ chooses one of them. This can also be played in pairs. ■ Back to board: This is another guessing game, but this time the student who is ‘it’ has to guess a word by asking the rest of the class questions. The student sits facing the class, back to the board; the teacher writes a recently studied word or phrase or idiom on the board, out of sight of the student. The student asks different students yes/no or either/or questions in order to guess the word. For example: Helga, is it a verb or a noun? (A verb.) Dittmar, is it an action? (No.) Karl-Heinz, is it something you do with your mind? (Yes.)… etc. To make the game easier, the words chosen can be limited in some way—e.g. all phrasal verbs; all character adjectives, and so on.

103

How to Teach Vocabulary

■ Pictionary®: Based on the commercialised game of the same name, this involves students guessing words or phrases from drawings. They work in teams, each member of the team taking turns to be the ‘artist’. If there are three teams, for example, the three ‘artists’ go to the front of the class where the teacher shows them a word (or phrase) on a card. At a cue, they quickly return to their group and try to get their group to correctly guess the word by drawing it with pen and paper. The first team to guess correctly earns a point, and three new ‘artists’ have a turn with another word. This is good for reviewing idiomatic expressions, such as green with envy, down in the dumps, under the weather, in the dark, over the moon. At the end of the game, groups can use the pictures as memory prompts in order to recall and write down the expressions that came up in the game, and then to put them into a sentence to show what they mean. ■ Word snap: Using word cards—e.g. from the class word bag or word box (see page 51) - students work in small groups, with the aim of collecting as many word ‘pairs’ as possible. One player ‘deals’ two word cards, face up, so that everyone can read them. The first player to think of a way the words are connected gets to keep the pair, and two more words are laid down. A connection could be: same part of speech; synonyms or antonyms; same lexical set; or, simply, a meaningful sentence can be made using both words. If no connection can be made, the two cards are shuffled back into the pack. The teacher will need to be available to decide in the case of connections being ‘challenged’. ■ Word race: The class is divided into teams and each team is given a board marker pen (or piece of chalk). The board is divided into as many sections as there are teams. The teacher (or a specially appointed student) says a word in the students’ language, and the first team to get the correct English translation on to the board earns a point. The game continues for as many words as it is felt necessary to review. The game is suitable for a monolingual class, but a variation of it, which would be suitable for multilingual classes, would be to read out definitions of words, or give synonyms or show pictures, rather than give translations. ■ Spelling race: The board is divided in two halves, and a representative from each of two teams stands at the board with a board marker pen or chalk. The teacher shows the rest of the class a word on a card. The teams must simultaneously spell (not say) the word to their representative, who cannot see the word. The first team to get the word on to the board with its correct spelling earns a point. The game continues with different students taking turns to be the team representative. This game is more difficult than it sounds, especially if words are chosen that include letters which are frequently confused - such as i and e, v and b, j and g. Lots of variations of this game are possible. The word could be displayed as a picture, so that the teams have to decide what the word is before spelling it.

104

6 • How to put words to work

The above is by no means an exhaustive list of word games, but is representative of some generic game types, guessing being one of the most favoured. Used with discretion, putting words to play is a valid and enjoyable way of putting words to work. Conclusions

In this chapter we looked at classroom activities designed to integrate newly acquired words into the learner’s mental lexicon. Key principles underlying such activities are the importance of: • making successive decisions about words • productive as well as receptive tasks • the judicious use of highly engaging activities such as games Decision-making tasks include the following types: • • • • •

identification selecting matching sorting ranking and sequencing

Production tasks can be divided into those that require: • completion of sentences and texts • creation of sentences and texts Games that draw attention to newly learned words often encourage recall through guessing and categorising. Looking ahead

In Chapter 1 we established that words both ‘contain’ other words (as head is contained in ahead), and that a word-like unit may in fact consist of several words (as in head and shoulders or a head start). In fact, there seems to be a continuum of ‘wordiness’, from individual syllables, up to what are now commonly called lexical chunks. This expanded notion of what a word is— and how it impacts on teaching—is the subject of the next chapter.

105