SWEETER Dulce > Blog

For & Against Essays A “for & against” essay is a formal piece of writing in which a topic is considered from opposing points of view. You should present both sides in a fair way by discussing them objectively and in equal detail. A good essay of this type should consist of: a)

An introductory paragraph in which you clearly state the topic to be discussed, without giving your opinion;

b)

A main body in which the points for & against along with your justifications, examples or reasons are presented in separate paragraphs; and

c)

A closing paragraph in which you state your opinion or give a balanced consideration of the topic.

Note: Opinion words (I think, I believe, In my opinion, etc.) can only be used in the closing paragraph where you give your opinion on the topic.

Points to consider Before you start writing your essay you should make a list of the points for & against. Each paragraph should start with summarizes the topic of the paragraph.

a

topic

sentence

which

E.g. In addition, many people feel reading is a relaxing and worthwhile activity. Do not use informal style (e.g. short forms, colloquial language, etc.) or strong language to express your opinion (e.g. I know …, etc.). Express your opinion in a non-emotional way (e.g. It seems that, therefore one feels that …, etc.). Well-known quotations relevant to the topic you are writing about will make your composition more interesting. For example, if you are writing an essay on education, a quotation you may include is: “Education is a progressive discovery of your own ignorance” , as Will Durant said Note: Although these are balanced arguments, if you feel that either the for or against side is stronger and should be ed, this side should

SWEETER Dulce > Blog be presented in paragraphs 4 & 5, thus leading the reader to your conclusion.

Structure Introduction

(Paragraph 1)

State topic (summary of the topic without giving your opinion) Main body Paragraph 2 Arguments for and justifications, examples, and/or reasons Paragraph 4 Arguments against and justification, examples, and/or reasons Conclusion (Final paragraph) Balanced consideration/ your opinion directly or indirectly

Useful expressions and linking words/phrases To list points: Firstly, First of all, In the first place, To begin/start with, Secondly, Thirdly, Finally To list advantages: One/Another/A further/An additional (major) advantage of … is … The main/greatest/first advantage of … is … To list disadvantages: One/Another/A further/An additional (major) disadvantage/drawback of … The main/greatest/most serious/first disadvantage / drawback of … Another negative aspect of …

SWEETER Dulce > Blog To introduce points/arguments for & against: One (very convincing) point/argument in favour of … / against …, A further common criticism of … / It could be argued that …,

It is

often

claimed/suggested

widely

argued/maintained/

generally

felt/believe/held

that …

claim/suggest/argue/feel that … maintain/believe/point out/agree/hold that some/many/most … people/experts/ advocate (+ing/noun)/ the view that … scientists/sceptics/ oppose the view that … critics in favour of/against … are

of the opinion that/convinced that … opposed to …

To add more points to the same topic: in addition (to this), furthermore, moreover, besides, apart from, what is more, as well as, not to mention (the fact) that, also, not only … but also/as well/both … and, There is another side to the issue/question/argument of… To make contrasting points: it may be said/argued/claimed that, … on the other hand, however, still, yet, but, nonetheless, nevertheless, even so,

oppose this viewpoint others/ (strongly) disagree …, many people

claim/feel/believe this argument is incorrect/misguided

although, though, even though, while, whilst, whereas, despite/in spite of (the fact that), regardless of the fact that… /While/Although …, it cannot be denied that …

SWEETER Dulce > Blog

Example (For & Against Essay) “Censorship is necessary in modern society”. Discuss. Censorship is an issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate, with ers maintaining that it is vital in order to protect society, whilst opponents claim that it is an unjustifiable restriction of public access to information. Firstly, all countries have secrets which must be safeguarded for reasons of national security. For instance, if an enemy country were to acquire such highly sensitive information, the effects could be catastrophic. Consequently, governments have to have the power to restrict access to information concerning areas such as the armed forces or particular aspects of foreign policy. Secondly, it is often argued that censorship is necessary to prevent the broadcast and publication of obscene material which is considered offensive or harmful to public morals. Many people feel that, without censorship the public would be constantly subjected to material that the majority would find offensive. For this reason, the government has a duty to impose certain restrictions on the mass media by censoring films and texts which contain explicit scenes of sex, violence or foul language. In contrast, opponents of censorship point out that when it is abused by governments, censorship becomes an instrument used to misinform society and maintain power. In order to control the flow of information which riches the public, repressive regimes try to put constraints on the media, thus denying citizens the right to information owing to the fact that governments believe it may lead them to seek greater freedom. Furthermore, it is generally felt that mature adults are able to make informed choices about what they watch, read and listen to and should, therefore, be permitted to make their own decisions. For example, some comedians make use of offensive language taboo subjects in their performances. Critics of censorship argue that the only people who will watch or listen to such material are adults who have made a conscious decision to do so. Thus, it is claimed, it is unjust to censor material like this since it is not forced upon people who may subsequently be offended by it. All things considered, it can be concluded that a certain degree of censorship is always necessary. The best course of action would be to attempt to achieve a balance between the requirements of the country and the public on the one hand, and individuals’ rights on the other.